Ever since Watergate, the cardinal rule of
Washington political damage control has been simple: If you have nothing to hide, don't
behave like you do. More often than not, the Clinton administration routinely ignored
that common-sense adage in handling its scandals - withholding information and parsing the
English language until Bill Clinton's credibility was in shreds.
More recently, Rep. Gary Condit (D-Calif.) made the same strategic error, managing to
seem guilty even when cops said they had nothing on him in the disappearance of Washington
intern Chandra Levy.
Bush had been briefed about potential hijackings prior to 9/11. Now the control freaks
of the Bush administration, which always has thumped its collective chest over its tight
discipline and abhorrence of leaks, have belatedly been caught stonewalling what it knew
and when it knew it about the Sept. 11 hijackings.
Ever since that miserable day, the Bush White House has been content to let politicians
and reporters think Bush's predecessors were asleep at the wheel fighting the terrorist
threat.
Now it turns out, eight months after the fact, the Bush government knew more about the
danger than it had let on, until press secretary Ari Fleischer's terse statement last
night.
How much more, and how culpable that makes a President whose conduct of the
anti-terrorist war has drawn widespread public approval, is certain to be the subject of
intense political debate in the weeks ahead.
The fact that Fleischer confirmed details of the President's intelligence briefing -
something he and previous government spokesmen never do - suggested the White House
clearly is concerned about the appearance of a coverup.
But a Bush political source predicted the Democrats were unlikely to try to capitalize
on "a national tragedy."
"It all depends on whether people conclude we did everything we could and
failed," he said. "Or whether we had a warning and blew it. I tend to think we
will get the benefit of the doubt.
"I don't think the Democrats can play around with such an explosive issue."
The revelation that Bush had been briefed about potential hijackings marks a shift in
the official version of events surrounding the Sept. 11 attacks.
Bush and other administration officials have generally characterized the terrorist
hijackings as a sneak attack that could not have been foreseen.
"It's hard to envision a plot so devious as the one that they pulled off on
9/11," Bush said in a January interview with NBC's Tom Brokaw. "Never did we
realize that the enemy was so well-organized."
The new information suggests there may have been less of an intelligence failure before
Sept. 11 than some lawmakers have alleged - though it also raises new questions of whether
more could have been done to halt the terror attacks.
|